Unintentionally Inappropriate Science Papers

October 12th, 2008
Innapropriate Chemistry Fig. 1

The Nobel prizes were awarded last week. I say prizes in reference to the ever-important Ig Nobel prizes in addition to the normal boring prizes. I say ever-important because the Ig Nobel prizes always have a direct impact on the common man! This year, the Ig Nobel for chemistry was awarded to a group of researchers for discovering that Coca-Cola could be an effective spermicide, where the vanilla Nobel was awarded for discovering some glowing jellyfish protein. Which research truly has more important to the common cola-guzzling man?

The Annals of Improbable Research are always a great source of laughs. Most of which are comedic in a sad way because somehow scientists are getting research grants for absurd things like pouring out caffienated beverages on stuff when you are a poor student surviving mostly on a diet of caffienated beverages.

However, there exists another rare specimen of comedy in scientific literature: unintentional innuendo. To appreciate this low-brow/high-brow LOL-mashup, it helps to fall into a sweet spot of ignorance wherein you don’t quite know the definition of a particular term in the given context, but you confide in the fact that the research is peer-reviewed so you know it can’t be as it sounds!

I’ve included a list of some of my favorites as an example, in a handy semi-correct citation format.

A N Oraevsky, Spontaneous emission in a cavity, PHYS-USP, 37 (4), 393-405 (1994)
D Kleppner, Uninhibited Spontaneous Emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 233 – 236 (1981)
D. Vlassopoulos, et al. From hairy balls to hairy rods : Using macromolecular chemistry to bridge the gap between polymers and colloids, The Journal of Rheology (2000)
W. Simon, Nuts Have No Hair, Class. Quant. Grav. 12, L125-L130 (1995)
S. Tanveer, Surprises in Viscous Fingering, J. Fluid Mech. vol. 409, pp. 273–308 (2000)
C. Glocker, F. Pfeiffer, Multiple impacts with friction in rigid multibody systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 7 Number 4, 471-497 (1995)
U. Andreaus, P. Casini. Friction oscillator excited by moving base and colliding with a rigid or deformable obstacle. Int. Journal of Non-Linear Mech. Vol. 37, Issue 1 117-133 (2002)
W. Likos, N. Lu. Automated Measurement of Total Suction Characteristics in High-Suction Range: Application to Assessment of Swelling Potential, Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 1755 119-128 (2001)
W. Zhong, M. Zhang, Jet penetration depth in a two-dimensional spout–fluid bed. Chemical Eng. Science. Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages 315-327 (2005)
X. He, M. Dembo, Numerical Simulation of Oil-Droplet Cleavage by Surfactant, J. Biomech. Eng., Volume 118, Issue 2, 201 (1996)
R. Wozniak, M. Rout, J. Aitchison. Karyopherins and kissing cousins. Trends in Cell Biology, Vol. 8 Issue 5 184-188 (1998)
Are there any papers of this nature I am missing? Sometimes the titles of papers just aren’t as lude as I hope. I searched through TATA box papers for hours the other day…

Posted by Chris Filed in LOL
7 Comments »
7 Responses to “Unintentionally Inappropriate Science Papers”
Will Says:
October 12th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
“Origin of Stratification in Creaming Emulsions”

http://prola.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v77/i3/p578_1

Eugene Says:
October 22nd, 2008 at 2:33 pm
Now everyone is talking about the American economy and eclections, nice to read something different. Eugene

daniel Says:
November 28th, 2008 at 10:04 am
Chris . . you have a dirty dirty mind, but oman, that was hilarious to read.

Danny Says:
January 7th, 2009 at 12:53 am
RG5Q9u8x3JZ0o

Nerdy Science Blog » Blog Archive » It Is Not Dirty Science Says:
February 3rd, 2009 at 5:58 am
[…] paper is talking about, but the image in this paper definitely can give you a good laugh! Thanks Jacks of Science for posting this […]

Rob Cogner Says:
July 11th, 2009 at 2:22 pm
mmmm…. viscous fingering

Ben Shirley Says:
February 23rd, 2010 at 1:06 pm
Our company uses an Internet content filter called Surf Control (by WebSense), which is a very common product. I couldn’t figure out why they would have blocked your site for being sexually explicit–it’s just science! I think this post is what did it. LOL, indeed!

Leave a Reply
Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website

SEARCH THIS SITE

PAGES
About Us
Archives
Blogroll
Music
CATEGORIES

Select Category
BLOGROLL
A Blog Around the Clock
Astronomy Picture of the Day
Biology in Science Fiction
Improbable Research
MacResearch
Molecule of the Day
Pharyngula
Shtetl-Optimized
Uncertain Principles
CANADIAN SCIENCE BLOGGERS
Backreaction
BioCurious
Drugs and Poisons
Eastern Blot
Genomicron
Michael Nielsen’s Blog
Morning Coffee Physics
Physicality of Words
Sandwalk
Science Creative Quarterly